top of page

Separate is Not Equal | Deaf Performers Were Not Included At The Halftime Show


The National Football Conference champion Los Angeles Rams defeated the American Football Conference champion Cincinnati Bengals, 23–20. Congratulations to the LA Rams for winning the Superbowl trophy. Yet, the entire programming of the Super Bowl left a bad taste in my mouth.



As a deaf person, I always anticipated seeing the national anthem and "America the Beautiful" performed by professional deaf entertainers who use American Sign Language.


This time, we saw an influx in news publications leading up to the Super Bowl event to see the Deaf performers on television. I'm letting out a sigh of relief, "Finally! It's about time that we are starting to see the inclusion of Deaf people on the screen for millions of people who have hearing loss to be able to have access."


It ended up becoming a significant disappointment for the deaf community as the ASL performers were excluded from the halftime performances and cast aside in a dark area where it's difficult to see the signers. Did you see the ASL performers on screen? Were you able to view the entire show in ASL on your TV screen? I didn't think so. The ASL performers were put in the endzone, in the dark, where it isn't easy to see the performance. The only way to see the ASL performance was through different programming that only a limited number of people knew about it and could access. How is that equitable communication access? Another case in point, it was not captioned for our deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers to make it worse. Captioning is another form of accommodation that millions of people rely on for accessibility. I've heard stories from hearing people who prefer to view closed captions during music performances. The captioning was not visible on the screen during most of the show, and it's like listening to a concert without sound.


Did you know that during the ASL rendition of the National Anthem & "America the Beautiful," a man was standing in front of Sandra Mae Frank, pacing back and forth, taking his hat off, and scratching his head, blocking the view? In addition to the barriers to communication, the captioning on the NBCSports app was not showing at all.


I realized it was never about providing access to the deaf, hard of hearing, and DeafBlind people. I see this as an act of tokenism.


Tokenism: "the practice of doing something (such as hiring a person who belongs to a minority group) only to prevent criticism and give the appearance that people are being treated fairly." - Merriam Webster.


Deaf people were excluded from viewing the ASL rendition of the Superbowl performance. How many deaf people knew that they had to download an app or view a specific link to be able to enjoy the programming of SuperBowl Halftime performance or the national anthem? This type of accessibility requires the user to be savvy with technology and only accessible to those who subscribe to cable companies.


I got so many questions from the deaf community:

  • How do I access the app?

  • How does it work?

  • Where do I find the ASL show?

  • Why are the ASL performers not on stage?

  • Where are the captions?

It was overwhelming that I ended up spending the first half of the Superbowl making a video in ASL explaining to our deaf viewers how to set up access to view the ASL performers. I barely managed to help only a few deaf people in time before the Halftime Show.


Think of it, hearing people have the privilege to enjoy the show by just turning on the channel, watching it at a restaurant, or simply by showing up at the game. Functional equivalency means having the same benefits and access to entertainment, just like hearing people. Functional equivalency is ensuring that deaf people can also have the privilege of enjoying the show at a friend's house party, restaurant, or by showing up at the game. How is it possible to provide equitable access? The answer is right in front of you. Broadcast the ASL performers on a pip screen on the TV screen while on they are the stage for everyone to see while displaying accurate captioning. What's the point of hiring Deaf ASL performers when you are not planning on including them on stage for deaf viewers to see? Are we ashamed to show Deaf people on TV during the Superbowl Halftime Show?


What will it take for deaf, hard of hearing, and DeafBlind people to be heard, seen, and valued as humans of society?


Learn more about Access Vine: www.accessvine.co

Request for Disability Inclusion Training: inquiries@accessvine.co


Extra Links:

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/deaf-musicians-part-super-bowl-halftime-show-1st-82832857





16 Comments


eastfoxboro
Feb 16, 2022

I am not deaf but I have Not noticed any accommodations for the deaf community in any of the programming I watch. With the technology of today, TV’s ! …should be set up to accommodate the deaf community. In other words all TV sets have a setting that receives extra information for the deaf. Then Every program and TV could have a separate setting for the deaf community. I’m sure someone out there could figure it out! Get to work gentleman, I know you can figure this out….please.

Like

mikwar1
Feb 16, 2022

Thank Amanda for the excellent comments. I agreed the technology is available for development of selecting a “click” choice of Captions or PIP of ASL or Interpreter of events Being Broadcast.

Like

Tom Willard
Tom Willard
Feb 15, 2022

They have been having ASL signers at the Super Bowl since 1992. Anyone who has paid even the slightest bit of attention would not expect to see the whole performance on TV. It's never been done that way. It will never be done that way.


I think it was around 15 years ago that they started posting the performances online so that people who want to watch can watch.


And yet, every year, "Waa! Waa! They didn't show the signers."


Boy, am I tired of this.


If people are too dumb to figure out how to do stuff, what are the rest of us supposed to do? Spoon feed them?


They don't show the full…

Like
Juliette Alexandria
Juliette Alexandria
Feb 15, 2022
Replying to

I almost never reply to a comment like this one, but... Really? I can think of many parallels where there may be 1 out of 500+ people affected by the situation but it would be unthinkable to "Wonder why [organization] even does all this in the first place."


Do you "wonder why" organizations who invest time, money, and effort to research a relatively rare disease "even [do] all that in the first place."


I don't need to utilize the handy audible count-down at crosswalks that let folks with vision impairments know it's still safe to cross, but I do not "wonder why [local government] even [do] all this in the first place." It's pretty clear to me why.


That.

Like

Elizabeth Heberling
Elizabeth Heberling
Feb 15, 2022

Amanda, Thank you so much for writing such a truthful, honest article, it was very well written! As an interpreter, I was very disappointed that NBC and the FCC failed the Deaf Community AGAIN! They need to hear the voice of the Deaf Community!

Like

Basil Reyna
Basil Reyna
Feb 15, 2022

Although I was not able to watch the Game at all and also had no idea that there would have been Deaf Performers on Stage, I think that what I have learned from people out there who advocate for the deaf were very unhappy for what the outcome was, leaving the deaf community in devestating awe. I am a former interpreter for the hearing impared and I would have loved to have seen the Performance. I hope that in the future not just Superbowl, but the entirety of any broadcast that is important to the deaf community be shown in their language.


Like
bottom of page